Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Once-Daily Darunavir With Cobicistat and Weekly Isoniazid/Rifapentine.

BACKGROUND: Once-weekly isoniazid with rifapentine (HP) for 3 months is a recommended treatment for latent tuberculosis infection in persons with HIV. HP reduces exposures of certain antiretroviral medications, resulting in limited options for the concomitant use of these therapies. Here, we examined the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of darunavir/cobicistat with HP. METHODS: This was an open-label, fixed sequence, two-period crossover study in persons without HIV. Participants received darunavir 800 mg/cobicistat 150 mg once-daily alone for 4 days, then continued darunavir/cobicistat once-daily for days 5-19 with HP coadministration on days 5, 12, and 19. Intensive PK assessments were performed on days 4, 14, and 19. PK parameters were determined using noncompartmental methods. Geometric mean ratios with 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and compared between phases using mixed-effects models. RESULTS: Thirteen participants were enrolled. Two withdrew after day 4, and one withdrew after day 14. Of the 3 withdrawals, 2 were attributed to drug-related adverse events. Darunavir area under the concentration-time curve, maximum concentrations (Cmax), and concentrations at 24 hours postdose (C24h) were reduced by 71%, 41%, and 96% ∼48-72 hours after HP administration (day 14), respectively, and 36%, 17%, and 89% with simultaneous HP administration (day 19), respectively. On day 14, 45% of the predose and 73% of C24h concentrations were below the darunavir EC50 (0.055 µg/mL). CONCLUSIONS: Darunavir exposures were significantly decreased with HP coadministration. Temporal relationships between HP coadministration and the extent of induction or mixed inhibition/induction of darunavir metabolism were apparent. Coadministration of darunavir/cobicistat with 3HP should be avoided.

Vaccination Ameliorates Cellular Inflammatory Responses in SARS-CoV-2 Breakthrough Infections.

BACKGROUND: Data on cellular immune responses in persons with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection following vaccination are limited. The evaluation of these patients with SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections may provide insight into how vaccinations limit the escalation of deleterious host inflammatory responses. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of peripheral blood cellular immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection in 21 vaccinated patients, all with mild disease, and 97 unvaccinated patients stratified based on disease severity. RESULTS: We enrolled 118 persons (aged 50 years [SD 14.5 years], 52 women) with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Compared to unvaccinated patients, vaccinated patients with breakthrough infections had a higher percentage of antigen-presenting monocytes (HLA-DR+), mature monocytes (CD83+), functionally competent T cells (CD127+), and mature neutrophils (CD10+); and lower percentages of activated T cells (CD38+), activated neutrophils (CD64+), and immature B cells (CD127+CD19+). These differences widened with increased disease severity in unvaccinated patients. Longitudinal analysis showed that cellular activation decreased over time but persisted in unvaccinated patients with mild disease at 8-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections exhibit cellular immune responses that limit the progression of inflammatory responses and suggest mechanisms by which vaccination limits disease severity. These data may have implications for developing more effective vaccines and therapies. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT04401449.

Efficacy of Cochleated Amphotericin B in Mouse and Human Mucocutaneous Candidiasis.

Candida albicans causes debilitating, often azole-resistant, infections in patients with chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis (CMC). Amphotericin B (AMB) resistance is rare, but AMB use is limited by parenteral administration and nephrotoxicity. In this study, we evaluated cochleated AMB (CAMB), a new oral AMB formulation, in mouse models of oropharyngeal candidiasis (OPC) and vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) and in patients with azole-resistant CMC. OPC and VVC were modeled in Act1-/- mice, and mucosal tissue fungal burden was assessed after once-daily treatment with CAMB, vehicle, or AMB-deoxycholate (AMB-d). Four patients with azole-resistant CMC enrolled in a phase 2 CAMB dose-escalation study. The primary endpoint was clinical improvement at 2 weeks followed by optional extension for long-term CMC suppression to assess safety and efficacy. CAMB-treated mice had significantly reduced tongue and vaginal fungal burdens compared to vehicle-treated mice and exhibited comparable fungal burden reduction relative to AMB-d-treated mice. All CAMB-treated patients reached clinical efficacy by 2 weeks, three at 400 mg twice daily and one at 200 mg twice-daily dosing. All patients continued to the extension phase, with three having sustained clinical improvement of OPC and esophageal candidiasis (EC) for up to 60 months. One patient had a relapse of esophageal symptoms at week 24 and was withdrawn from further study. Clinical responses were not seen for onychomycosis or VVC. CAMB was safe and well-tolerated, without any evidence of nephrotoxicity. In summary, oral CAMB reduced tongue and vaginal fungal burdens during murine candidiasis. A proof-of-concept clinical trial in human CMC showed efficacy with good tolerability and safety. This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02629419.